You Are Not an Above-Average Driver. Neither Is Anyone Else Who Thinks So.
You think you're a better driver than most people. Safer. Sharper reflexes. Better instincts in traffic than the idiot two cars ahead.
You're probably wrong. And so is he.
Illusory superiority is the tendency to rate yourself above the median on skills you can't actually measure against other people. Driving. Reading a room. Judging character. Being a good friend. You compare your best moments to their worst, and you call the gap your personality.
This isn't a quirk. It's math being defied by nearly everyone at once. By definition, half the population sits below the median on any given skill. Ask people where they think they land, and the number who say "above average" runs as high as nine in ten. Somebody's arithmetic is broken, and it isn't the median's.
The Study That Should Have Ended the Argument in 1981
Ola Svenson ran a survey in Sweden and the United States in 1981, asking drivers a blunt question: how do you rank yourself for skill and safety against everyone else on the road? The results appeared in Acta Psychologica under the title "Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers?" The title was rhetorical. The data answered it anyway.
Between 88% and 93% of respondents placed themselves in the top half for driving skill. Not the top half for safety and a middling spot for skill, some reasonable trade-off. Both categories. Nearly everyone believed they were simultaneously more careful and more talented than the person next to them. Break the sample down by age, by gender, by years behind the wheel, and the pattern refuses to budge. Novice drivers with a handful of hours logged rated themselves above average. So did drivers with decades on the road and a full file of citations. The bias doesn't discriminate by experience because it was never built from evidence in the first place.
The study has been replicated for over four decades, across different countries, ages, and driving records, and the shape of the result doesn't move. A 2023 US survey found 86% of drivers rated their own driving "excellent" or "very good," while only 23% extended others that same rating. A 2024 study using a Japanese adult cohort found the same pattern holding outside driving entirely, in moral judgment and general competence. This isn't a driving quirk. It's a self quirk, and driving is just where it's easiest to catch.
Why the Gap Never Closes on Its Own
Here's the part that should bother you. This isn't a bias you'd notice and correct through experience, because experience feeds it instead of fixing it.
You have full access to your own effort. You remember the near-miss you avoided through good reflexes, the moment you let someone merge, the times you checked your blind spot out of genuine care. Nobody else's dashboard shows you their internal effort. You only see their output — the guy who cut you off, the friend who forgot your birthday, the coworker who missed the deadline. You're comparing your intentions to their results. That's not a fair fight, and it was never designed to be.
Self-enhancement motive does the rest of the work. Rating yourself as below average feels bad, so the mind quietly declines to do it, and biased information processing supplies the evidence after the fact. You don't consciously decide you're better than most people at reading character. You just notice, again and again, the times you were right, and let the times you were wrong slide past without a label.
The Feedback That Stings Isn't Wrong. It's Just Unexpected.
This is why criticism lands like an attack instead of information. When someone tells you you're a mediocre listener, or an average manager, or a driver who tailgates, it doesn't compute against the model you're running. Your internal self-image already filed you as above the line. The feedback isn't just unwelcome — it's a contradiction the brain has to resolve, and the easiest resolution is deciding the feedback is wrong, not the self-image.
That's how a blind spot survives for years. Not because nobody ever points at it. Because you've already decided, quietly and long ago, that nothing is there to see.
So Actually — Being Average Isn't the Insult You Think It Is
Here's the reframe, and it's not a consolation prize. The instinct is to treat "you're probably average at this" as a demotion, something to argue against. That instinct is the bias talking. Being average isn't a character flaw. It's just math. Half of everyone is below the median on every skill that exists, and that fact says nothing about your worth — it says something about how medians work.
What actually matters is what you do with the asymmetry once you see it. You can't get full access to how other people experience your driving, your leadership, your friendship. But you can go looking for the data you've been filtering out. Ask where you're worse than you assume. Ask someone who has no incentive to flatter you, and specifically ask them to name the thing, not to reassure you about the thing.
The people who correct for illusory superiority aren't the ones who feel worse about themselves. They're the ones who stopped needing the feeling to be accurate.
The Closing Thought
Somewhere right now, someone is quietly certain they're a better judge of character than everyone around them — and that certainty is the exact mechanism that will stop them from ever finding out otherwise.
Follow The Shadow Self Media on TikTok · Instagram · Facebook